Since nine years old, I actively observed others’ actions and situations. On meeting people, I had a sense of what they were like – good, bad, or neutral, but I rarely shared my feelings with others; I was just a child, but I kept a mental record of my experiences with people and I stayed away from the ones I didn’t like, even if I couldn’t explain why.
By 7th/8th grade, my perceptions became pronounced. Not only did I recognize a certain personality type, I had an inner sense of what made those individuals tick. Somehow, I seemed to know their motivations for their actions. I never talked about to my parents; I just accepted my intuition, though it confused me. When I met someone I thought was a “bad” person, I wondered why others didn’t think that too. I watched relationships between people, especially my friends' parents, and wondered why they acted the way they did. I especially wondered why they put up with people and situations I thought they should not have.
In high school, I focused on boys, dating, and homework (perhaps an odd combination), and I started to ignore my intuition. That ignorance led to mediocrity. Issues I should have placed high on my priority list took a backseat, or no seat at all. I didn’t realize I needed to pay attention to my intuition if I was going to succeed.
I loved helping others. I vividly remember standing up for a girl on the playground in fourth grade. The girls I played with wouldn't let her join our group jumping rope. I talked to the girl, decided she was absolutely fine, and demanded the girls let her join us. They backed down and accepted her, which of course made me feel great. I had accomplished something, and I was glad I helped her feel accepted. Unfortunately, I didn’t continue on that path. I was seduced by having fun, and like most children, I focused on myself.
My desire to help others didn’t reappear until I was 17 and a freshmen in college. On my dorm floor, one by one, girls knocked on my door to see if I had time to listen to their problems. I had no clue as to why they chose me, but I became known as the floor psychiatrist. I was the most naïve girl on the floor, but they trusted me to hold their secrets, and I did. I listened, and miraculously, my innocent and positive comments helped them feel better and see things clearly. Once I graduated, I veered off track again. I took an editorial job at CBS to write the opinions of management. Interestingly, in each career move I made, co-workers chose me as their confidant, just like the girls in the college dorm had done. I never gossiped and never divulged their secrets. That trait was never part of me. I despised gossip and still do to this day.
Naiveté can hurt people, and intentionally hiding from reality doesn’t help. No one is all good; no one is all bad, but some people have a propensity toward one more than the other. It’s up to us to see which side comes through more often and to stay away from those who exhibit the side you choose not to be. Birds of a feather DO stick together. I treat all conversations as confessions. No one has to ask me to promise not to repeat it. I must stay true to my core values and my word. That's what being a friend should be, and that's what a coach should be for you.
I grew up with a mother who "knew" people. I didn't understand how, but within two minutes of meeting a person, she could later describe their personality traits. I would say to her, "How did you know that? You're psychic," to which she adamantly replied, "No, I am not. I'm just perceptive." Time proved all her opinions about people to be true. I was amazed at her ability (she was not a people-person), and to irritate her a bit, I would call her a psychic. As I experienced more in life, as I observed a person's every move, listened to every word, delved into the person's motivations, I developed my own brand of perceptiveness.
I knew when a person was lying. I could sense a person's inner sadness. I became so confident in my ability to see through individuals, I began testing it. At networking events, I engaged people in conversations and I could weed out the BS, the inflated truths, the outright lies, and the arrogance covering their insecurity. I am not psychic, and I now understand why it upset my mother to be called that. It negated her ability to listen intuitively and to observe. Judging is not a popular word these days, but judging is exactly what we do when we meet a person. Is she boring? Is he arrogant? Does she think she's the only her opinion matters? Is he narcissistic? We form opinions with every new person we meet, and when done through careful and cautious observation, I think "judging" is a good thing.
Judging tells us when to beware. It guides us to good people and steers us away from the bad. The alternative is to go into relationships and situations blindly. We wouldn't buy a house without a reputable inspection. We wouldn't sign a contract without careful legal review. Why would we enter into a relationship without careful observation and judgment of that person? Too many people leave relationships (business and personal) in shock at the person's behavior. If they had paid attention to every word delivered in all communication modes, the betrayal and the shock would not have happened. It's called living life with eyes wide open, which means PAYING ATTENTION. Pay attention to everything. We use very little of our brain power--not a good way to experience life. Being naive is great at five, appropriate at 10. As adult, being naive is dangerous.
College doesn't teach the skill of perception or intuition, but that doesn't mean adults shouldn't learn it. Start opening your eyes, your ears, your heart, and tune in. Pay attention to all you encounter, to all who surround you. Perception is the greatest and most helpful gift you will learn. It doesn't come magically as it may to psychics; you will have to work to achieve it, but when you do, you will see all it offers.
It's important to get along with co-workers, and people often make friends with others in the office, but always remember you are at work, not at a social club with members who come and go. That means jobs take precedence and getting ahead can be part of that process. And that means competition.
You may say you'd never edge a co-worker out of a position, but never say never. When an position opens that two of you want, competition enters into it. You two may agree to interview for the job, which means presenting all you have done and will do for the company. Now your true nature will come out. Who will you decide to be?
Have you said things in confidence that could now be exposed? Trust is always an issue because as much as you "hang out" with a so-called co-worker/friend, you don't know what that "friend" will say to get a promotion or a raise. I've worked at a company where two young females vied for the same position. Those wonderful friends became cutthroat and back-biting, and when one edged the other out of the position, the one left behind seethed. Not only did her anger boil within, she began to plan her triumph over the other, and she delighted when her "friend" decided the job was too much for her. Little did this coworker-friend know that her "friend" had planted ideas in the president's mind, pointing out her mistakes and weaknesses on the job. You may think this wouldn't happen to you, but the fact is you don't know, unless of course, you already know you're the type to sabotage anyone who gets something you wanted.
Be careful what you say and to whom you say it. Be careful what you admit. There'a a reason to never say anything negative about anyone at work. Unless you're a psychic, you don't know what the future holds.
By Alfie Novak, assisted by Lindsey Parker Novak
One of the most serious writing problems people have, which I think will lead to overall communication problems, is word choice. For the past decade, people have been overly concerned with being politically correct. They agonize over choosing the right word – the one word that will skirt around the issue, say it politely, and offend no one. People have made word choice so difficult an exercise that it seems they think political correctness is more important than honesty. In that search for just the right word to ease the reader into the possible bad news or unfavorable situation, the writer sacrifices clarity, and more important, honesty of the message.
Call it naiveté, but I prefer honesty. As a dog, I am nothing but honest. When I love, I wildly wag my tail and my behind. When I am scared, such as when my mom, Lindsey, wants to bathe me, I drop my head and rush to hide under the bed. She’s a gentle bather, but I can’t help it – I just hate water. When I am hungry, I howl and sing for my meals. When I want to be petted, I nuzzle her hand or leg, or whatever I can reach, so she knows I need to be touched right then. The point is that I always show my feelings. I don’t hide my joy, my fear, my anxiety, or my desires.
And yes, I call her my owner. I know just what you are thinking. Calling her my owner is not politically correct. Well, I say “rubbish.” That’s right. All this political correctness is dog poop.
Extremists are demanding that people call themselves “pet companions.” Frankly, I want more than a companion, I love her and I want her to own me. I want someone to take responsibility and take good care of me. I want my owner to tell everybody that I belong to her, that I am her dog and no one else’s. That tells me she is dedicated to me. That tells me she will give me the kind of committed love I want and deserve. To feel that type of love and loyalty, “owner” is clearly the proper word.
She is not some pet companion who happens to occasionally take me for a walk. She is mine as much as I am hers. She feeds me breakfast, lunch, dinner, and healthy snacks because I am adorable. And because she knows nobody likes to eat a hunk of food at one time and then starve for the rest of the day. She is responsible to me and for me, and that comes with ownership. We love each other deeply, and of course, she is my companion, too.
But “companion” isn’t strong enough. I don’t want people to think they can borrow me or think that I am a casual friend, or worse yet, someone who is paid to be with me. She wants to be with me, and that is the best choice she has ever made. I am her dog, her possession, and yes, she owns me. If someone tried taking me, she would tear out after the person, knowing I am hers and hers alone. I would never go off with any other human no matter what the person offered me. We keep an eye on each other.
What if someone heard her refer to me as her pet companion? This person might think I am available and try to lure me away with biscuits or any other form of edible treats. If I were like our neighbor’s dog, a real chowhound, any form of food might be used to entice me to run off with another woman. I am simply not interested. I prefer the obvious and proper word of “owner,” because with ownership comes warmth, love, loyalty, and responsibility. I want her to feel a sense of ownership. I am not just a ship passing in the night. I belong to her, and she belongs to me.
Words have many connotations, but staying away from the words that “say it like it is” is a mistake. Communication needs to be straightforward, clear, and concise. My owner, which I plan on calling her for as long as I live, often chooses other choice words to describe me, and I lap it up when she refers to me as prince of pooches, love bunny, honey bunny, baby cakes, sweet pea and myriad other names of affection. She even refers to me as “my king of the house.” So with titles such as these, a handsome dog like me would be a fool to object to her saying she owns me. I howl “Hurrah for being owned and down with political correctness.” Now, if we could get everyone else to use the proper words when writing, we would not have the communication breakdowns that seem to affect us all.
Alfie Novak by Lindsey Parker Novak
Alfie’s favorite word is “massage,” which means his silky, silver-gray hair is going to be brushed with a luxurious natural bristle brush. His least favorite word is “bath.” Alfie has a multitude of sounds that stream out when he experiences the delight of a new and healthy treat, and follows those rolling notes with a giant smile. He learned his vocabulary from Lindsey, who is committed to him for life.
Every year we make a fair number of decisions, some more important than others. But what about the decisions that we somehow make without our knowledge?
At each year-end, I reflect and realize that, without intention, I had made the decision not to have children. Year after year would fly by, and though I did not consciously say I did not want a child, I made no decision to have one. Suddenly, making no decision turned into the making of quite an important one. To wake up 40-something, single, intelligent, practical, and childless is to realize that the decision has been made for me.
Numerous articles explain what can be medically done for pregnancies labeled high-risk (over 40), but few or no articles deal with the reality that rearing a child is an exhausting, sometimes rewarding, sometimes tedious, and immensely expensive proposition for a single mother. Apart from the number of divorces, children of once-married couples will at least have the knowledge they have two parents who hopefully love them. Not so for the child of a single mother.
Those were the thoughts that repeatedly race through my mind when I get that sinking feeling I have missed out on the most meaningful experience a woman can have. No matter how much pain and suffering a pregnancy can cause, no matter how much time and trouble a child can take, there is also the reoccurring pain that haunts me that I have made an important decision without realizing I have made a decision.
Of course, a life without children leads one to experiencing a totally different set of circumstances and situations, and who’s to say which life is better. It seems that many mothers fantasize about the life they would’ve had if they had remained single and childless. Friends have envied me for my freedom, my independence, my lack of responsibility, and even for my solitude whenever I wish. But with that freedom, independence and solitude comes a very heavy price. A decision that is as permanent as the decision to have a child.
At 30, postponing children was not serious. We retain the thought about having another ten years, and we will just see what happens. Even at 35, we quietly remain smug with the knowledge we can change our situations and our minds at any time. But 40 creeps up faster than one can imagine, and in our 40s, it isn't so easy to give up a free-and-easy lifestyle, knowing we are to trade it in for one filled with diapers, toilet training, school decisions and problems, belt-tightening, baby-sitters, and the overall knowledge we are now responsible for two lives instead of one.
Yes, it is a heavy price to pay whichever decision we make. I just wish I had been around when I was making it.